RAID 5 does not usually fail because a drive stops spinning.
It fails because actions are taken after the first failure — when parity confidence is already compromised.
These Technical Notes exist to document the mechanical realities of RAID 5 behavior during degraded operation: rebuild stalls, silent corruption, metadata loss, and controller-driven failure cascades.
They are not recovery promises.
They are not troubleshooting shortcuts.
They are a diagnostic record of how RAID 5 actually behaves in the field — across enterprise controllers, mixed disk populations, and real-world failure sequences.
Each note isolates a single failure mechanism so administrators, engineers, and decision-makers can understand what is happening before irreversible actions are taken.
What These Notes Are For
The RAID 5 Technical Notes are written to support:
- Triage decisions after a failure
- Incident analysis when outcomes don’t match expectations
- Understanding why “healthy” arrays still lose data
- Preventing parity overwrite and metadata destruction
They assume familiarity with RAID concepts and focus on cause, sequence, and boundary conditions, not basic definitions.
How to Use These Notes
- Start with TN-R5-001 for system-level behavior
- Reference additional notes only as needed
- Do not apply corrective actions based solely on controller status
- Treat rebuilds and parity operations as destructive until proven otherwise
These notes are intended to be cited by incident pages, recovery assessments, and internal engineering discussions.
RAID 5 Technical Notes Index
- TN-R5-001 — RAID 5 Failure Behaviors, Rebuild Stalls, and Metadata Desynchronization
- TN-R5-002 — Parity Confidence vs. Hardware Health
- TN-R5-003 — Latent Sector Errors and Why Rebuilds Surface Them
- TN-R5-004 — Why Parity Checks Become Destructive in Degraded RAID 5
- TN-R5-005 — Drive Order Ambiguity and Stripe Misalignment
- TN-R5-006 — Why Rebuild Retries Compound Damage
- TN-R5-007 — Controller Automation as a Failure Accelerator
- TN-R5-008 — Software Reconstruction vs. Hardware Rebuild